Previously we talked about a number of challenging questions, asked of
the disciples by the Lord Jesus and by angels, between the resurrection and the
ascension of Christ. This post picks up where we left off. The last question,
asked as the followers of Jesus stood looking into the sky after he disappeared
into the clouds, was a “wake up and start doing what he told you” kind of
question. How did they respond? They stopped staring and started believing and
obeying.
1) Numbered…
“All these with one accord” but someone was missing (Acts 1:12-26)
12 Then they
returned to Jerusalem…
13 And
when they had entered,
they went up to the
upper room,
where they were staying,
Peter and John and
James and Andrew,
Philip and Thomas,
Bartholomew and
Matthew,
James the son of
Alphaeus and Simon the Zealot
and Judas the son
of James.
14 All
these with one accord were devoting themselves to prayer,
together
with the women
and Mary
the mother of Jesus,
and his
brothers.
If you happened to be counting, this is a
list of the eleven Apostles after Judas had died. Jesus had kept them all safe,
even at the moment of his arrest (John 18:1-10). Remember how in John 17:11-12
Jesus prayed to the Father,
And
I am no longer in the world,
but they are in the world,
and I
am coming to you. Holy Father,
keep them in your name, which you have given me,
that they may be
one, even as we are one.
While I was with them,
I kept them in your name, which you have given me.
I have guarded them, and not one of them has been lost
except the son of destruction,
that the Scripture might be
fulfilled.
However, as the remaining apostles and
other disciples and followers waited in Jerusalem and prayed for the Holy Spirit, Peter
realized that there needed to be twelve apostles for the symbolism of the
people of God, the New Israel, to be complete in the church.
In Acts
1:15-26 Peter makes his case,
15 In those days
Peter stood up among the brothers
(the company of persons was in all about
120) and said, 16 “Brothers,
the
Scripture had to be fulfilled,
which the Holy Spirit spoke
beforehand
by
the mouth of David concerning Judas,
who became a guide to those who
arrested Jesus.
17 For he was numbered among us and
was allotted his share in this
ministry.”
[Note: v. 18-19
contain a rather forensic parenthetical description of the demise of Judas’
body after his death. If you don’t believe me look it up.]
19 And it became known to all the inhabitants of
Jerusalem,
so that the field was called in their own language
Akeldama, that is, Field of Blood.)
20 “For it is written in the Book of Psalms,
“‘May his camp become desolate,
and let there be no one to dwell in it’;
and let there be no one to dwell in it’;
and “‘Let
another take his office.’
Let me take a moment to mention that skeptics often point to this
apparent discrepancy regarding the death of Judas in their attacks on the
accuracy of the Bible. Yet I am confident that the biblical account is not
conflicted. So, let’s ask the question. Did Judas “hang himself” as Matthew
wrote (Matt 27:5, which reflects the language in Jeremiah 19:1-13), or did he “fall
headlong…” as Dr. Luke graphically recorded? The answer is, “Yes!” Matthew
focused on the suicide aspect depicting the awful end of the betrayer for a Jewish
audience, and Luke emphasized the post-mortem decay of Judas’ body to make a
point for his Greek audience. As Expositor’s Bible Commentary explains,
“After all, suicide of itself was heinous for Jews. But
this would hardly suffice for Luke, Theophilus, and others in the Gentile world
who would read Luke's account. Gentiles under Stoic influence generally looked
on suicide as morally neutral. But Luke wanted to stress the awfulness of
Judas's situation in a way that would grip his readers.”
Why was the number of apostles such a big deal to Peter?
While people around here wear the number twelve as a show of support for the Seattle Seahawks football team, that was not Peter's concern. Certainly, the number twelve would have
carried a significant symbolic load in Israel—referring generally to divine
government. Some see it as indicative of God's authority, perfection, and
completeness. In addition, the coming of the Holy Spirit (for whom they were
waiting) was seen to be tied with the inauguration of the Kingdom Age and Jesus
had taught that "in
the new world, when the Son of Man will sit on his glorious throne, you
who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the
twelve tribes of Israel." (Matt
19:28; Luke 22:28-30). Peter
was closely considering what Jesus had said.
Twelve followers who had been with Jesus through his trials would one day judge
the twelve tribes. The problem was that they were now one apostle short. To
match the twelve tribes of Israel, there needed to be twelve witnesses of the
resurrection. As we can see, Revelation 21:12-14 shows the pervasive use of the
number twelve in the symbolism of the New Jerusalem…It [the New Jerusalem] had a great, high wall, with twelve gates,
and at the gates twelve angels,
and on the gates the names of the twelve tribes of the sons of Israel
were
inscribed—on the east three
gates, on the north three gates,
on the south three
gates, and on the west three gates.
And the wall of the city had twelve foundations,
and on them were the twelve names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.
Jesus had chosen all the original apostles,
so who could be considered to come out of the bullpen to replace Judas in time
for Pentecost? Peter gives two criteria in v. 21-23.
So one of the
men who have accompanied us
during all the time that
the Lord Jesus went in and out among
us,
beginning from the baptism of John
until the day when he was taken up
from us—
one of these men must become with us a witness to his
resurrection.”
And they put forward two,
Joseph
called Barsabbas, who was also called Justus,
and
Matthias.
It seems that there
were only two men who met the requirements. First, the man needed to have been a witness to the full ministry of Jesus (v. 21-22); and secondly an eyewitness
to the resurrection of Jesus (v. 22).
These qualifications are necessary, because, as Peterson writes, “They could
guarantee ‘that it was the same Jesus who had led his disciples during his
ministry that now led the Church as her exalted Lord.’” (David G. Peterson, The Acts of the Apostles PNTC, 127.)
The two men who were
put forward included Joseph Barsabbas
Justice (listing his Hebrew name, Aramaic nickname, and Roman name) and Matthias (which as I like to say was
short enough to fit on a Martyrs' Bubble Gum Card). From the outside, they were
equally qualified. So who would be chosen? The apostles left the decision to
the Lord…via the use of prayer and the casting of lots which was a culturally
appropriate way to decide (Proverbs 16:33).
24 And they prayed and said,
“You, Lord, who know the hearts of all,
show which one of these two you have
chosen 25
to take the place in this ministry
and apostleship
from which Judas turned aside
to go to his
own place.”
26 And they cast lots for them,
and the lot fell on
Matthias,
and he was numbered with the eleven apostles.
What
does their brief prayer reveal?
Take a moment to consider their prayer and
ask, “What does this say
about Jesus?” and, “What does this imply about being an apostolic witness?” The
text answers the first by revealing what they believed about Jesus and hints at
the need for such “heart knowledge” in selecting an apostle. Remember that King
Saul had been tall and good-looking on the outside but proved to be rash and
disobedient inside (1 Sam. 9:2), but God chose King David based on what man
could not see (1 Sam. 16:7). Hence, only Jesus was qualified to choose this apostle.
There were many different contexts in which “casting lots” was used to
impartially determine the Lord’s choice in the Old Testament (e.g., Lev.
16:7-10, 21-22; Joshua 14:2; 18:6; 1 Chronicles 6:54, 61; 1 Sam 14:41-42; Neh.
10:34). However, this is the last recorded example. Soon afterward the Holy
Spirit would inaugurate a new age and empower the church to more clearly know
the will of God. Expositor’s Bible Commentary concludes, “So by the appointment of Christ himself,
the full complement of apostles was restored and the church was ready for the
coming of the Holy Spirit and the beginning of its mission.”
It is worth noting, that Matthias, according to all traditions, served
faithfully as a resurrection witness, even unto death whether in Jerusalem
(stoned and beheaded) or the Caucasus region of modern-day Georgia (beaten and
crucified).
What about us? What can we learn
from this story? While we are not apostles in the sense that Matthias and the
others were, we too are called to be witnesses! As Christian witnesses, we should
seek to have (1) a solid understanding of the content of the Gospels, and
confidence in their historicity (that they are accurate and true), (2) a belief
in the resurrection of Christ Jesus, and (3) a heart surrendered to the love of
Christ.
Caution: The use of the lot in
Acts 1 is descriptive (tells us what did happen) not prescriptive (what should
happen) for our decision-making today, however, we can learn several things
from this narrative that we can readily apply to our lives. Here are a few…
- They sought and nominated those who were qualified to serve (Based on relationship to Jesus, not on resources, status, or giftedness).
- They prayed in faith asking for God’s answer (They didn’t settle for a vote).
- They knew that Jesus knew what they didn’t…the inner heart life of everyone. They didn’t depend on their own wisdom and discernment but inquired of the Lord.
- They trusted his answer and didn’t call for another toss; too often we would call for two out of three! I remember hearing Elisabeth Elliot say that, “Struggling is simply delayed obedience.” In this narrative, there was neither doubt nor delay.
Each person matters in the kingdom. If even the hairs on our heads are
numbered, is it any wonder that each believer serves a unique and necessary purpose
in helping the whole body to grow?
2) Nurtured…
Working and Growing Together as One (Ephesians 4:1-7, 11-16)
As you read through the
following passage, look for the repeated use of the word “one” (9 times) for the
goal of the diversity of gifts listed—oneness that builds itself up in love.
I therefore, a prisoner for the Lord,
urge you to walk in a manner worthy of the calling to which you have
been called, 2 with all humility
and gentleness, with patience, bearing with one another in
love, 3 eager to maintain the unity of the Spirit
in the bond of peace. 4 There is one body
and one Spirit—just as you were called to the one hope that belongs
to your call— 5 one Lord, one faith, one
baptism, 6 one God and Father of all, who is
over all and through all and in all. 7 But grace
was given to each one of us according to the measure of Christ's gift...
11 And he gave the apostles, the prophets,
the evangelists, the shepherds and teachers, 12 to equip the saints for
the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ, 13 until we all attain
to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to
mature manhood, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of
Christ, 14 so
that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro by the waves and
carried about by every wind of doctrine, by human cunning, by craftiness
in deceitful schemes. 15 Rather, speaking
the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the
head, into Christ, 16 from
whom the whole body, joined and held together by every joint with which it is
equipped, when each part is working properly, makes the body grow so that it
builds itself up in love.
- Are we one? I am not aware of serious divisions within our congregation, but I would not yet say that we are one. Our culture is too caught up in individualism for us to easily and fully pursue the oneness of community.
- Is everyone doing their part? We all have gifts, talents, and areas of experience which we can humbly use for kingdom purposes.
- Are we doing what we are doing for the right reason? What is the right reason? It is not to earn favor for us, the parts are not to call attention to ourselves, or build our own little kingdoms, but our goal should be the building up in the love of the (one) body. We are invited to participate in what the Lord is doing in our midst so that we might build each other up in love.
The purpose of our gathering is neither knowledge, honor, self-improvement nor fulfilling a duty. Rather it is true Trinitarian worship—it is, “the gift
of participating through the Spirit in the incarnate Son's communion with the
Father. It means participating in union with Christ, and what he has done for
us once and for all, in his self-offering to the Father, in his life and death
on the cross. It also means participating in what he is continuing to do for us
in the presence of the Father and in his mission from the Father to the world.”
(James B. Torrance, Worship, Community the Triune God of Grace, 21-22).
3) Needed…
We Need Each Other (Excerpts from 1 Corinthians 12:12-26)
14 For the
body does not consist
of one
member but of many.
15 If
the foot should say,
“Because I am not a hand, I do not belong to the body,”
that would not make it any less a part
of the body…
19 If
all were a single member,
where would the body
be?
20 As it
is, there are many parts, yet one body.
21 The
eye cannot say to the hand, “I have no need of you,”
nor again the head to the
feet, “I have no need of you.”…
But God has so composed the
body,
giving greater honor
to the part that lacked it,
25 that
there may be no division in the body,
but that the members may
have the same care for one another.
26 If
one member suffers, all suffer together;
if
one member is honored, all rejoice together.
So many things that
are taught in this passage—let me just briefly touch on four healthy themes for our church:
- Understanding & Unity—Different roles and purposes are needed within the one body for it to be healthy and functional (v.12, 17-20). We need to become more understanding as we unite with those who are different from ourselves.
- Acceptance & Belonging—Because we are not a [insert role here] doesn’t make us any less a part of the body (v.15-16). We should not long to be a different part or fill a different role than where the Lord has placed us. We belong where he has placed us…will we accept it as he has accepted us?
- Relationality & Humility—Despite our cultural inclinations, none of us can say we have no need for another member of the body/church (v. 21-24a). We don’t get to play the rugged individualist in the church. We can’t say we don’t need each other.
- Care & Compassion—If one [insert experience here], all [experience/feel the same] together. (v.26). Thank you for letting me watch as you pray and care for each other in the Lord!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comment will become visible after it is seen and approved by the blog administrator. Thanks for your patience and thanks for engaging this topic.